Page 20 of 33
Jamstix 3 Information
Posted: Fri Oct 16, 2009 8:07 am
by wil
Hi i wish u 'll do a better skinning support like u have said before
.
So if we can easylly to skin Jamstix u'll don't need to satisfy all of youre customers
.
By the way JS3 looks better than JS2 .
But i prefer the ableton or zebra style too
And i agree about so much space for border buttons etc...
Anyway i 'll certainly buy it.
Keep your excellent work.
Jamstix 3 Information
Posted: Fri Oct 16, 2009 8:34 am
by Ralph @ Rayzoon
me_pt wrote:alot of times i'll use jamstix to get an idea, then create a modified loop that is very specific to my riff needs and build the song like that. but i really like jamstix's fill feature and would love to have my specified "loops" play along and fed into jamstix--then when the tool wants to play a fill...it "mutes" the track and plays the fill. this would be AWESOME. it would be useful to give life to anyones programmed song as well.
Maybe I don't understand but that is what JS does. When the fill starts and 'No Groove' is checked then the fill mutes the groove.
Tombuur: good idea on the temp fill storage for audition.
JPRacer: I find Delphi/Pascal much more elegant than C while having the same power and speed. It's a shame it never got enough market penetration.
ETA for JS3 is still fluid. We should have a Beta fairly soon.
Jamstix 3 Information
Posted: Tue Oct 20, 2009 8:26 am
by DarFin
Ralph [RZ] wrote:Tombuur: good idea on the temp fill storage for audition.
I have missed that feature several times, so +1.
Jamstix 3 Information
Posted: Tue Oct 20, 2009 9:52 am
by tombuur
Maybe a temporary fill storage doesn't have to be very complicated? For me a simple A/B between two fills would do, then you can keep the fill you have or replace it with the new one.
As it is now you always lose a fill if you generate a new one. Then sometimes you don't get the fill you like best. It's gone forever.
Jamstix 3 Information
Posted: Tue Oct 20, 2009 11:05 am
by BitFlipper
tombuur wrote:Maybe a temporary fill storage doesn't have to be very complicated? For me a simple A/B between two fills would do, then you can keep the fill you have or replace it with the new one.
As it is now you always lose a fill if you generate a new one. Then sometimes you don't get the fill you like best. It's gone forever.
A proper Undo/Redo feature would have also worked here, but we are not getting that either...
Jamstix 3 Information
Posted: Thu Oct 22, 2009 5:43 pm
by soultime
BitFlipper wrote:tombuur wrote:Maybe a temporary fill storage doesn't have to be very complicated? For me a simple A/B between two fills would do, then you can keep the fill you have or replace it with the new one.
As it is now you always lose a fill if you generate a new one. Then sometimes you don't get the fill you like best. It's gone forever.
A proper Undo/Redo feature would have also worked here, but we are not getting that either...
the only fault i could ever find with jamstix is no undo/redo feature but the truth is - that's what a real drummers like.
Jamstix 3 Information
Posted: Fri Oct 23, 2009 6:17 pm
by flynsk_01
Though they are skinnable
...once.
Jamstix 3 Information
Posted: Sat Oct 24, 2009 11:50 pm
by napoleon
is jamstix 3 is going to be compatible with Windows XP?
Jamstix 3 Information
Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 2:41 am
by studio64
napoleon wrote:is jamstix 3 is going to be compatible with Windows XP?
I am sure Ralph will not be excluding 99% of computer music makers, so I'm sure it will.
Regards
Jamstix 3 Information
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 2:15 pm
by Ralph @ Rayzoon
Yes, and it will work on W7 as well.