RAYZOON

Sorry for the gap in replying, I was away from the studio for a few days. Beta 9 has fixed the 'integer' message for me. The only thing I still get is audio distortion, which seems to be related somehow to the Downmix button in the mixer tab or the number of active outputs in Cubase. If I only have 1 JS output active in my VST rack with downmix enabled i get distorted audio (mainly on the snare channel - the signal isn't clipping anywhere, buffer @ 512 and my asio usage is around 30% with virtually no disk usage), if I enable all VST rack outputs and switch off Downmix the distortion disappears. Equally, if I have only the 1 JS output active in the rack and switch Downmix on but manually set JS to output it's routing to single output from the drop down arrow, again, the distortion disappears. I've played around with higher buffers, changing LoD settings/pre-buffer in JS with no change when the audio is distorting.

Greg Dean wrote:If I only have 1 JS output active in my VST rack with downmix enabled i get distorted audio (mainly on the snare channel - the signal isn't clipping anywhere, buffer @ 512 and my asio usage is around 30% with virtually no disk usage),

Can you repeat this and then send me rzdlog.txt?

Ralph [RZ] wrote:

jpettit wrote: I did not see it anywhere but is JS multithreaded and using all CPU cores?

Yes, JS is multi-threaded. Whether it uses all cores depends on host and OS. GUI and audio threading are controlled by the host. JS adds load-threads for sound loading and LoD.

Please send me rzdlog.txt from Documents\Jamstix3.

Sent today...

Ralph,

I've sent you my rzdlog as requested, along with a couple of realtime export audio examples. Hope this helps.

Resent rzdlogs and audio examples but I did get a delivery failure notice from one of the emails. Will send again if anythings missing. Let me know.

Hey Ralph

Yes, beta 9 has solved the "integer" problem for me too...

Every now and again the first kick of the first bar distorts and i have to change the sample

...otherwise all is running smoothly

Should there be a difference in cpu and memory usage? Have run beta 9 on Reaper 32 and 64bit and there seems to be no major change in either...should there be?

Hey ralph,

OK, from what it seems when i save, beta 9 crashes...not sure if thats the case with everyone??

also when installing paks i get an error message on some samples within the pak, tells me to contact the jamstix...

ok, able to save...not sure what happened there...might have been Reaper...still get the error on the paks..

In my experience, the Pak installer errors are false positives. Can you copy the contents of the Pak installer output panel and email them to me?

Hey Ralph!

"Can you copy the contents of the Pak installer output panel and email them to me"

...what do you mean there?