Feature Request

Use this forum for general discussions and questions about Jamstix
Ralph @ Rayzoon
Site Admin
Posts: 5860
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 6:24 pm

Feature Request

Post by Ralph @ Rayzoon »

Duly noted. The SDK thing is something we're not ready for anytime soon but has been considered down the road.
Ralph
Rayzoon Technologies LLC
Foolomon_
Posts: 40
Joined: Wed May 25, 2011 3:25 pm

Feature Request

Post by Foolomon_ »

Ralph [RZ] wrote:Duly noted. The SDK thing is something we're not ready for anytime soon but has been considered down the road.
I appreciate that. If you didn't design the system from the outset to have a split between the GUI and the underlying AI then this is far from a trivial thing to do.

Really what I'm after is a better interface. For example, I would never do editing in JS. I export MIDI; import into Cubase; and edit there.

This would require that the AI be separate from the "sound module" function currently in JS and is also the reason why I requested that the JS kits be recreated as Kontakt .nki files (and let's also add drum maps while we're at it) since Kontakt player is free. Even though I use the Battery mappings, if there were .nki files I would be more likely to use the JS kits.

Yes, I'm assuming everyone uses Cubase, which I know isn't true. But Kontakt does have RTAS and AU versions, I believe, so users of other DAWs wouldn't be left in the dark.

My suggestion does eliminate the ability to rearrange drumkits in the GUI, but I suspect not too many people do this in any case. Do you have statistics on this?
kindafishy_
Posts: 70
Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2010 5:23 pm

Feature Request

Post by kindafishy_ »

Ralph [RZ] wrote:I've put this on the JS4 list, mate.
Ralph!!! It works in 3.5!!! Since you're saying that it will be in JS4, I can only assume that it was not planned that it works, but it does and it is beautiful!

I'll still be in the front of the line for JS4 though :).
Post Reply