Hello again y'all.
I understand jamstix uniqueness is in the interactive "jamming" ability, used as a plug in.
But I'm kinda of an edrum freak, and like scrolling through sounds, different sounds conjure different feels.
Jamstix sounds great! And i love all the different pres and paks.
But, the one thing I consistantly notice, is that JS is a few miliseconds slower to react when playing live edrums. Slower than say, Toontrack.
I have an RME card that can go down to 48 buffer size, but it seems JS is programmed at about 512. Maybe this is to make it run good as a plugin.
Other than that drag time, all is well, keep up the great work.
kevin
The only thing......
-
Ralph @ Rayzoon
- Site Admin
- Posts: 5851
- Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 6:24 pm
The only thing......
The 'slowness' you observe is quite odd since Jamstix adds no latency and its reaction time is based solely on host/driver MIDI and audio latency. How do you observe the slowness?
Ralph
Rayzoon Technologies LLC
Rayzoon Technologies LLC
The only thing......
Its a feel. I can without doubt feel the slower reaction time between programs. Both Battery and Toontrack feel more quicker, JS has a tiny drag. -shrug-